I thought this video was worth showing people. It is a bit like our situation but I don’t think we have the number of people they have but we could get the percentages. We also have a lot of external support from other groups. Public opinion does count
But his comments on Chester radio station Dee 106.3 sparked a backlash from opponents of coal bed methane and shale gas extraction.
Cllr Jones was asked by local resident and businessman Matt Bryan, who is camping at the Upton site, whether householders living near full scale extraction operations will see their council tax reduced if house prices fall.
The council leader responded: “The house prices in Cheshire are broadly 10 or 11 times the average salary. “So for house prices to come down a little bit after their huge increases over the last 20 years might be a really good thing for our young people who cannot afford housing. “We are losing our young people from Cheshire. The number of young people in Cheshire is going down because they can’t afford to live here, which is not good for our economic future prosperity.” Continue reading STUPID OR WHAT ?
The report by a panel of 14 INTERNATIONAL experts concludes “data about potential environmental impacts are neither sufficient nor conclusive.”
So little is known about the long-term impacts of extracting gas by fracturing rock beds with high-pressure fluids that scientists and regulators need to start now to understand how to develop the resource safely and cleanly, according to co-author Rick Chalaturnyk, an engineering professor at the University of Alberta.
In an interview with CBC News, Chalaturnyk said “additional information needs to be collected to better understand and manage those impacts.” Continue reading The report by a panel of 14 INTERNATIONAL experts
A new Conservative government would grant local residents powers to block all new onshore wind farms within six months of taking office, party pledges
No subsidies will paid to operators of new onshore wind turbines if the Conservatives win a Commons majority next May, they will promise. is the latest hardening of Conservative rhetoric on green energy. s capacity by 2020. But no more onshore turbines would be put in place beyond that, Michael Fallon, the energy minister, will say. Under current planning rules, big onshore wind farms are handled by a national infrastructure regime that can ignore the wishes of local people. The Tories would change those rules so that major sites would be processed by local councils, allowing local politicians to reflect the views of residents.
Planning policies would also be altered to give greater weight to local concerns about landscape and heritage.
If the Conservatives win the election next year, they would put new curbs on wind farms in place by November 2015, Mr Fallon said. The UK has “enough” onshore turbines he said.
“We remain committed to cutting our carbon emissions. And renewable energy, including onshore wind, has a key role in our future energy supply. But we now have enough bill payer-funded onshore wind in the pipeline to meet our renewable energy commitments and there’s no requirement for any more. “That’s why the next Conservative Government will end any additional bill payer subsidy for onshore wind.”
TESLA has written to town hall bosses saying it intends to carry out a seismic survey of parts of Salford, Trafford and Wigan on behalf of IGas.
The firm responsible for the controversial drilling at Barton Moss is behind new plans to conduct a geographical study of three Greater Manchester areas as part of its quest for gas.
The study, which would map the geological structure of the area, is part of IGas’ ongoing work to analyse the potential reserves of shale gas and coal bed methane across the north west.
It will also take in parts of Warrington and covers an area from Worsley and Boothstown in the north to Flixton and Carrington to the south. It stretches from Eccles in the east to Glazebury to the west, taking in Astley.
With the opening of a new wind farm next month, El Hierro, population just over 10,000, will become the first island in the world to be fully energy self-sufficient through combined wind and water power. The five wind turbines will provide 11.5 megawatts of power, enough to meet the demand of the population and the desalination plants on this small crop of land off the coast of Africa in the Atlantic Ocean.
When the wind isn’t blowing, hydropower will fill the void. When the wind is blowing, power will be used to pump water into a reservoir in a volcanic crater about 2,300 feet above sea level. Then when power is needed, that water will be released down to a lower reservoir and used to generate electricity on the way. This process is known as pump-storage hydroelectricity, and is used in many other countries across the globe — including the world’s largest outside of Washington, D.C.
“This system guarantees us a supply of electricity,” said the director of the Gorona del Viento wind power plant, Juan Manuel Quintero.
With the $75 million project set to come online, El Hierro will no longer have to rely on costly and dirty diesel generators for electricity — although it will maintain an oil power station just in case. According to Phys.org, the island’s transition to renewable energy will cut carbon dioxide emissions by 20,600 tons per year and save the island from using 40,000 barrels of oil a year.
Other islands are taking advantage of renewable resources to become wind- and solar-powered, but El Hierro is believed to be the first to do so exclusively with wind and hydro power and without having any connection to an outside electricity grid.
The National Grid has warned fracking firm Cuadrilla it will take legal action if its drilling operation for shale gas threatens to disturb its underground pipelines or overhead transmission lines, ClickGreen can reveal. The organisation has lodged a “formal objection” to a preliminary application by Cuadrilla to extend its search for shale gas in the Bowland Basin. The company has submitted an initial bid seeking to open up four exploratory boreholes near the Lancashire town of Kirkham, midway between Blackpool and Preston. But in a strongly worded letter to County Council planning chiefs, the National Grid has taken an unprecedented stance and warned of legal action should the drilling affect a nearby high-pressure gas pipeline as well as its high-voltage transmission overhead lines Continue reading National Grid warns fracking firm to stay away from its pylons and pipelines
The county council is to spend £30,000 on examining the likely impact on residents should the controversial drilling process get the go-ahead.
But Eve McNamara, from the pressure group Ribble Estuary Against Fracking, accused the authority of “just paying lip service” to safety concerns.
“In the past we have found that these Health Impact Assessments are just tick box exercises to appease the community. This is not an we want onshore in the UK because, if they did a proper impact survey, they would realise the impact is substantial. Data from Australia and the United States suggests this is not safe.”
Cabinet members will be asked to approve a Health Impact Assessment of two proposed fracking sites near Kirkham – Roseacre Wood and Little Plumpton. The investigation will look at possible contamination of land, water and air quality.
A report from the Lancashire’s director of public health, Dr Sakthi Karunanithi, to be presented to the cabinet meeting, says: “It is proposed that work is undertaken to identify information about the full range of potential health impacts.
“It is an opportunity for LCC to demonstrate its role to improve the health and wellbeing of its residents in relation to the ahle gas industry and highlight any potential risks at an early stage.”
The government is poised to announce that energy firms will be given the right to “frack” under private land without the owner’s permission, according to reports today.
It is understood the move will be included in the Queen’s Speech in June – paving the way to avoid any legal block by protesters if shale gas exploration is approved.
The legal move would change trespass laws.
According to national media reports, energy minister Michael Fallon is set to give more details at a shale gas supply chain conference in Blackpool on Thursday.
Gas exploration company Cuadrilla is planning to “frack” for shale gas at two sites in Lancashire – Rosecare Wood and near Little Plumpton near Preston.
In the North West the number of residents backing a Greenpeace petition to launch a mass legal block against fracking has reached nearly 7,000, with almost 2,000 in Lancashire alone.
A spokesman for the Department of Energy was unable to comment on the reports this morning.
Councils that will play a key role in deciding the future of fracking in Britain have investments worth millions of pounds in companies behind the energy extraction method, The Independent can reveal.
Local authorities in areas identified as potential sources of gas have holdings via their pension funds in firms seeking to drill within their boundaries. One of the most significant investments is £1.9m held by Lincolnshire County Council’s pension fund in Total, the French company that earlier this year became the first oil major to enter Britain’s dash for shale gas, with a £30m stake in two exploration projects in the county.
West Sussex County Council also has indirect holdings in Cuadrilla, which was at the centre of controversial tests in the village of Balcombe last summer. The council also has substantial investments, currently worth £3.5m, in Centrica, the parent company of British Gas – which last year took a 25 per cent stake in a Lancashire shale-gas project operated by Cuadrilla, albeit not directly.
The Greater Manchester Pension Fund (GMPF), which invests on behalf of Salford and Trafford councils, holds shares in Henderson Group, a major investor in IGas, another fracking exploration company that is conducting shale-gas tests in the Salford area.
All the councils insisted there was no conflict of interest between their pension-fund investments and past or future planning decisions on fracking projects. They pointed out that shares had been bought in all cases except Lincolnshire via investment funds, and councillors involved with pension fund-related decisions did not sit on their planning committees.
But campaigners said it sent the wrong signal and called on the local authorities to sell their holdings.
Simon Clydesdale, energy campaigner for Greenpeace UK, said: “It’s a worrying discovery. Fracking is already a dirty enough industry without getting mired in the murky waters of conflicts of interest. Councils must disinvest and show local voters that they can be trusted to put the interests of their constituents first when making crucial decisions on fracking applications.”
With assets worth about £120bn, local authority pension funds are among Britain’s largest investors.
David Forbes, Lincolnshire’s assistant director of resources, said: “The pension scheme operates within a set of clear investment principles and is overseen by the pension committee, which makes its decisions independently from the county council.”
West Sussex County Council said its investment in Cuadrilla, worth some £26,000, was minimal and equated to some 0.001 per cent of the total value of its £2.45bn pension fund. In a statement, the council said: “Any indirect investments made by the pension fund’s investment managers would not have any influence at all in determining a planning application.”
Salford City Council said its planning panel members had no role in deciding where GMPF invested its funds. GMPF acknowledged its holding in Henderson Group but said it had no investment, direct or indirect, in IGas.